PTE写作SWT技巧讲解：sustainable development

大家都知道，SWT是PTE写作题目的重要部分。今天羊驼就给大家带来老师讲解的SWT技巧讲解：sustainable development。本文的解题思路为先找出中心句子，再找出围绕中心句的重点句子，最后串联成答案。

原文：

The Brundtland Report, Our Common Future (1987), defines sustainable development as "development which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs'. Implicit in this definition is the idea that the old pattern of development could not be sustained. Is this true? Development in the past was driven by growth and innovation. It led to new technologies and huge improvements in living standards. To assume that we know what the circumstances or needs of future generations will be is mistaken and inevitably leads to the debilitating sense that we are living on borrowed time. Only if we assume that society will remain static can we understand the needs of the future. The way we live today could not have been predicted twenty years ago. The sustainability paradigm fails to recognize this. It is a static view and thus places limits on human ingenuity. Similarly, a whole host of false assumptions dominate environmental thought; the scale of problems is exaggerated, the amount of resources is underestimated and spurious links are made between areas such as green policies and profit, poverty and environmental degradation. Those of us who want a better future need to question these assumptions.

解析：翻译：

The Brundtland Report, Our Common Future (1987), defines sustainable development as "development which meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs'.

布伦特兰报告《我们共同的未来》(1987年)将可持续发展定义为“既满足当代人的需要，又不损害后代人满足其自身需要的能力的发展”。

Implicit in this definition is the idea that the old pattern of development could not be sustained.

这一定义隐含的思想是，旧的发展模式无法维持。

Is this true?

这是真的吗?

Development in the past was driven by growth and innovation.

过去，发展的动力来自增长和创新。

It led to new technologies and huge improvements in living standards.

它带来了新技术和生活水平的巨大提高。

To assume that we know what the circumstances or needs of future generations will be is mistaken and inevitably leads to the debilitating sense that we are living on borrowed time.

假设我们知道未来几代人的情况或需求是什么是错误的，并不可避免地导致虚弱的感觉，我们是生活在借来的时间。

Only if we assume that society will remain static can we understand the needs of the future.

只有假设社会将保持静止，我们才能理解未来的需求。

The way we live today could not have been predicted twenty years ago.

我们今天的生活方式在二十年前是无法预测的。

The sustainability paradigm fails to recognize this.

可持续性范式没有认识到这一点。

It is a static view and thus places limits on human ingenuity.

这是一种静态的观点，因此限制了人类的创造力。

Similarly, a whole host of false assumptions dominate environmental thought;

同样，一大堆错误的假设支配着环境思维;

the scale of problems is exaggerated, the amount of resources is underestimated and spurious links are made between areas such as green policies and profit, poverty and environmental degradation.

问题的规模被夸大了，资源的数量被低估了，绿色政策与利润、贫困和环境退化等领域之间存在着虚假的联系。

Those of us who want a better future need to question these assumptions.

我们这些希望拥有更美好未来的人需要质疑这些假设。

第一部分：分析中心句

1、首先看段首，先说了一个可持续发展的报告，将Sustainable development定义为既满足当代人的需要，又不损害后代人满足其需要的能力。这里的定义隐含着什么东西呢？这是旧的发展模式，是不能持续的想法。而这个想法是否是真实的呢？这边就抛出了对应的疑问。过去的发展，它依靠的就是增长和创新，给我们带来了新技术和生活水平的一个巨大提高。只有说假设这个社会保持静止，我们才能理解未来的需要。我们今天所生活的方式，正是20年前他所无法预测到的。

2、到此为止，我们可能会有一些细微的感知，这道题目，其实就是要驳倒这种观点。

3、想要驳倒这个可持续发展的观点，我们就需要找出它错误的点，即它的定义。这就是本文的中心点。

第二部分：找出重要句子

1、再往后进一步点明了这点，这是一个静态的观点，限制了人类的一个聪明才智。

2、一大堆错误的假设，问题的规模其实在被夸大，而资源的数量被低估。绿色政治和利润、贫困、环境退化等等领域之间，存在着一些虚假的联系，这一句是进一步解释说明前面的句子。

3、这一句当中有很明显的分号，是在描述细节。最后他说，我们这些想要更美好未来的人，就需要去质疑这些假设。这一句是点题，他对于可持续发展是不太认可的。

第三部分：组成答案

我们将找到的重要中心句串联在一起，形成5-75字的一句话，这道题就完成了。